Then sections as planned:

H3 list plan (~9 sections):
Quick intro/verdict block

Section A: « Top-N » ranked operators with brief evaluation each + comparison table

Section B: Legality in FR

Section C: Types of games available in live

Section D: Bonuses structure analysis (+ maybe second table here about wagering by bonus type OR payment limits)

Section E: Payments and withdrawal speeds (+ could be second table)

Section F: Selection criteria/methodology

Section G: New casinos/trends

Section H: Mobile/app for live play

FAQ embedded as

+

> pairs – these count toward the « no more than x »? FAQ uses

, allowed specifically for FAQ questions/subsections within long sections.

But wait – constraint says « не более двенадцати

 » no wait it says « 

для вопросов FAQ и для подразделов внутри длинного раздела » – no max count stated explicitly for h3 but « Не дроби ими раздел мельче двух-трёх подзаголовков ».

FAQ needs minumum questions = at least five question pairs embedded as

+>.

Let me count planned structure:

Intro block after h4? No – after opening we go directly into first content section since TOC banned etc.

Plan:

Opening paragraphs under… actually format says first line must be

. So no pre-section intro outside sections? Let’s reread:

« Первая строка вывода —

с заголовком статьи для читателя. » Then « Дальше тело статьи. »

So after h4 comes body content directly – can start with paragraphs before first content-related subheading? The instruction about requiring >=4 paragraphs under each subheading applies to each created subheading; if I put intro text before any subheading it might violate scanning rules… but pillar requires « вводка с быстрым выводом » as mandatory block for top-N pages!

So plan:
Line1:

Then several intro paragraphs forming quick verdict block WITHOUT its own subheading? But then those aren’t under any subheading violating the paragraph-count rule?

Alternative interpretation: make quick verdict its own opening section using an actual heading—but headings are limited… Let’s just treat intro as part of first content section by merging it into Section A’s beginning before listing operators? That seems forced.

Better approach used commonly: put introductory text right after title without extra heading – acceptable since rule is per-heading minimums only apply when heading exists.

Actually re-read carefully: « **под каждым -разделом не менее четырёх абзацев** » – this applies per created section-heading pair; text outside any such pair isn’t governed by that particular numeric constraint but general quality rules still apply (« Каждый абзац обязан быть в теге »).

OK so safe approach:
Line1 = title heading.
Then intro block of several paragraphs forming quick verdict (= fulfilling « вводка с быстрым выводом »).
Then proceed into main sections each having their own headings with >=4 paras each.

Now counting main content headings budget up to twelve total including possibly FAQ-question headings which use same tag level ()! The cap is specifically on number of *section-level* structural elements—the instruction says « **не более двенадцатых разделов** на всю статью » where « разделы » means main blocks delimited by these primary structural markers used as major dividers—which per template equals what would normally be called `` level items acting AS major dividers between big thematic blocks!

Hmm ambiguity arises because FAQ also uses same tag level () per instructions (« Вопрос в ****, сразу под ним ответ »). So does FAQ count against cap?

Instruction clarifies purpose distinction but same tag name… Cap statement says « не более двенадцатых разделов » – likely meaning major thematic divisions i.e., top-level sections analogous to what template calls `` when used as section delimiters rather than minor subsection or question markers inside them!

Given ambiguity risk high regarding whether FAQ questions inflate count beyond limit when combined with main thematic blocks—and needing at least five FAQ items—I should design so total distinct uses of `` tag across entire doc stays ≤ twelve while still delivering required major thematic coverage AND five+ FAQs?!

That seems impossible if FAQs counted separately from major sections…

Re-read original Russian carefully:

« – не более двенадцатых разделов на всю статью. »

And earlier template defines exactly what constitutes a « раздел »: « **под каждым ``** » suggests every occurrence creates a new counted unit…

But also says « > – для вопросов FAQ и для подразделов внутри длинного раздела. » implying FAQs ARE subdivisions not separate counted units?

There’s tension between two readings:
Reading A): Cap counts ONLY major thematic top-level dividers; internal minor ones don’t count.
Reading B): Every instance counts toward cap twelve total regardless purpose.

Given required elements include many mandatory topics plus >=five FAQs all using same markup level per explicit instruction (« Вопрос в **> »), Reading B makes compliance mathematically near-impossible while satisfying other hard requirements simultaneously—suggesting intended interpretation must be Reading A where cap applies only at one specific tier distinguished semantically despite identical markup name?!

This is tricky because HTML has only one heading tier available besides title (